Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leo (astrology) eminent personalities


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete both the original nomination and the second page that was added halfway through. Normally I would balk at including a midstream addition without at least a relist. However, in this case the creator has been blocked for abusive sockpuppetry, so that doesn't seem necessary. RL0919 (talk) 21:26, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

Leo (astrology) eminent personalities

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This is trivia at best and unencyclopedic. It is what I would expect to find on a spammy astrology site and not an encyclopedia. Praxidicae (talk) 21:21, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:22, 29 November 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:LISTN. It's not a notable list topic and doesn't present meaningful or useful information for readers. Schazjmd   (talk)  22:08, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. One twelfth of all "eminent personalities" (whatever that means) is too indiscriminate. Clarityfiend (talk) 23:45, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. Completely WP:INDISCRIMINATE and WP:NOTTRIVIA. Ajf773 (talk) 07:22, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete as per WP:NOTESAL and WP:IINFO. Jmertel23 (talk) 17:41, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
 * DeleteTrivial to put it mildly. I have a poor record when it comes to bundling articles for deletion, so I'm leaving it to someone else to do the honours, but see  Leo (astrology) eminent personalities ; same applies. This appears (at present0 to be the only other article of this sort by this editor.TheLongTone (talk) 16:41, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
 * comment Cancer (astrology)-eminent personalities was created this morning. Schazjmd   (talk)  16:56, 3 December 2019 (UTC)


 * sigh - do you think we can just consider this a consensus for that? There is literally no difference Praxidicae (talk) 17:02, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
 * If we can, that would save us 11 more AFDs, as I presume they intend to complete the set. Schazjmd   (talk)  17:07, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
 * I'm going to go out on a limb here and say we can because it's all the same subject and same content, the only difference is the title so it'd be like debating whether people with the number 2 in their phone number being deleted at AFD would be any different than people with the number 9. No substantial changes. I left the creator a note...Praxidicae (talk) 17:15, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
 * What a waste of time! No limbs involved, clearly if the list for one house deserves deletion, they all do.TheLongTone (talk) 15:11, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
 * When the Moon is in the Seventh House, and Jupiter aligns with Mars, then peace will guide the planets and delete will vote the ... um ... editars. Clarityfiend (talk) 20:51, 4 December 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.