Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leo Award categories


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request undeletion of these articles. Liz Read! Talk! 04:17, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

Leo Award categories

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)
 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)
 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)
 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)
 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)
 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)
 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)
 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)
 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)
 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)
 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)
 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)
 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)
 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)
 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)
 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)
 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)
 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)
 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Cluster of poorly sourced articles for various categories of a regional film and television award. All but one of these are sourced exclusively to the awarding organization's own self-published content about itself, rather than any evidence that the awards get reliable source coverage in WP:GNG-worthy media, and the only one that does cite any outside sources at all just cites a small smattering of community hyperlocals and blogs, alongside what's still mostly the award's own self-published content about itself, and just one proper article in a major daily newspaper that actually verifies all of the winners (but not the nominees) that year. As always, award categories aren't automatically notable just because the presentations are technically verifiable on their own website — the notability test is the reception of third-party coverage in real media, but I've tried to source Leo Awards stuff properly in the past, and it's almost impossible because they just don't consistently get the necessary media coverage. And for added bonus, most of these have not been properly updated in years; only two of them go past 2016 at all, and even one of those stops at 2017, with only Musical Score in a Documentary having been updated all the way to 2021. These awards just aren't highly notable enough to get the comprehensive "standalone category articles" treatment that the Oscars, the Emmys or the Canadian Screen Awards get, because the depth of media coverage necessary to support that just isn't there. (Also, I struggle to understand why technical craft categories like picture editing and production design in children's television were somehow more important for us to have articles about than topline categories like Best Picture, which nobody has ever created at all, but that's a story for another day.) Bearcat (talk) 21:41, 31 January 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 22:07, 7 February 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:44, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 21:49, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 21:49, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 21:49, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Awards-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:58, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.