Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leo Connellan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   withdrawn by nominator per sources added. Dew Kane (talk) 22:13, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

Leo Connellan

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Non-notable person. Article contains no references that are reliable sources. Dew Kane (talk) 04:06, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep: the article needs work (and I will do some later today), but there is abundant coverage of this person in Google News (including a substantial bio in the New York Times), and he's profiled here in a book published by a university press. Clearly meets notability criteria. Gonzonoir (talk) 10:55, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment: I've done some cleanup and added 11 sources with inline citations to the article. Gonzonoir (talk) 11:42, 29 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep - Poet has published several works and is well covered in reliable sources (most notably the New York Times). PDCook (talk) 12:07, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:07, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:07, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep the subject clearly meets the notability criteria for authors, as above said. --Vejvančický (talk) 15:32, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.