Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leo Galleguillos


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. JForget 03:29, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

Leo Galleguillos

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

The article lacks reliable sources verifying this person's notability, and I wasn't able to find such sources with a Google News source. Prod removed by creator without the addition of reliable sources. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 22:13, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
 *  Keep.  Delete. (See rationale for vote change below.) I found this- an Opentopia.com bio on him.  He appears to be the owner of WorkSessions, a sort of competitor to Napster. It took me a while to pull this up, but the info is there.  I'm going to put this link to the bio info in the article.  Scott P. (talk) 23:17, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
 * That looks like a Wikipedia mirror site and therefore not a reliable source. It may be a copy of a previous version of the article, as it has been deleted before . Cassandra 73 (talk) 23:42, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
 * After taking a closer look, they got me. Looks like probably only one or two individuals have been promoting the Galleguillos Wikipedia article and the Opentopia writeup, which has much of the same wording, though sequenced slightly differently. Thanks.  Scott P. (talk) 23:53, 27 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Deleteas non-notable. Unverified, unsourced. A Google search turns up only websites, facebook, etc. --MelanieN (talk) 19:10, 1 January 2010 (UTC)MelanieN
 * Actually, from what I can tell, WorkSessions deals with music but does not compete with Napster. This might be better for the WorkSessions page rather than this page.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by TribalElliot (talk • contribs) 14:29, 2 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete. No reliable sources for the material found; a few local mentions of a homework help site.  Nothing to support the rest of the self-promotional bio; parts of which are clearly imanginary.  "nearly forced to declare personal bankruptcy", at the age of 14 or 15?  Nothing comes up on his other stuff except for what appears to be dedicated SEO.  Kuru   (talk)  16:40, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Note the article creator has attempted to remove !votes and alter others here. Kuru   (talk)  16:54, 2 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete. One of the sillier bio's I've read. I love that the infobox show his salary as less than 578,000 and net worth is less than 2.6 million. So is 99.8% of the US. What the hell is that supposed to tell us? Fails WP:BIO. Niteshift36 (talk) 21:43, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.