Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leo Kuvayev


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:11, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

Leo Kuvayev

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable spammer / sex offender. Most of the article has been tagged for years, and is mostly unsourced, and a search for sources brings back trivial passing mentions. In particular, claims against sexual abuse need multiple, high-quality impeccable sources, and we really don't have the required coverage here in my view. This is a textbook BLP violation - get rid of it. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  16:47, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Warm Regards, ZI Jony (talk) 19:25, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Warm Regards, ZI Jony (talk) 19:25, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. Warm Regards, ZI Jony (talk) 19:25, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 20:42, 27 June 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep inserted cites from established publications here, , . Otrantos (talk) 17:28, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
 * That is not good enough for a BLP on an alleged sex offender; we need good sustained coverage such that the article would be well-written and sourced anyway. How would you like it if this article was about you. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  07:38, 3 July 2018 (UTC)


 * Weak Delete. I don't think alleged sex offenders have a separate notability threshold. However, it seems this individual is primarily notable for the spam case from circa 2005 (the sexual molestation charge doesn't show up in English at least - sourced to Russian lenta.ru). This case received some coverage - but not sufficient in my eyes to pass NCRIME.Icewhiz (talk) 14:12, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep. Based on RS like this good book or BBC, he appears to be a notable spammer. That alone and significant number of sources retrieved by Google searches justifies the inclusion. As about other charges, they appear here and in other sources, I do not see all them as problematic. My very best wishes (talk) 17:27, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep seems to be notable for bad causes, but still notable. Coverage in RS is evident. Dial911 (talk) 01:11, 5 July 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.