Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leo Steel


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 21:10, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Leo Steel

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:GNG. Non-notable web game lacking significant coverage from reliable sources. The1337gamer (talk) 13:39, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions.  The1337gamer (talk) 14:11, 26 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete I can't find any coverage in valid sources from WikiProject Video games/Sources, just MobyGames. It claims to have been unique in its simple controls: I'm not sure it was unique even in 2004, but if it is verifiably a groundbreaking game or ancestor of the current crop of endless running games (Temple Run, etc) that might be a claim to notability. Colapeninsula (talk) 14:10, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable video game (in the continued absence of references to the contrary) Chris  lk02  Chris Kreider 16:16, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete No sign of notability. -- ☣  Anar chyte  ☣ 10:17, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.