Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leon Bolier


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep.  MBisanz  talk 04:06, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

Leon Bolier

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

No substantial coverage in third party, reliable sources. No "lasting and historical interest and impact" which it looks like it fails per WP:Music Oo7565 (talk) 20:40, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep - He shows up in a Google News search, albet with non-English sources, but that may point to his notability. Keep until translation proves otherwise. D ARTH P ANDA duel 20:48, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:51, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:51, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. One of the Dutch sources in Google News shows he played at a large event and puts him on par with Tiesto. The other mentions his name in the summary, but cannot be found in the article. I have not read the Polish articles. I'm leaning to keeping based on the material already in the article. - Mgm|(talk) 09:25, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep. Just wanted to say that he is currently one of my favorite artists and that I frequently hear his music on the radio. Although he is probably completely unknown in the U.S., I believe that the English Wikipedia should also cover topics which are not related to the United States. So, definetly keep it, I don't even understand why you would want to delete it... just because it may be irrelevant to you, doesn't mean it's irrelevant to everyone else! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.246.7.100 (talk) 23:28, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep I agree with panda. The article can always be nominated later if the non-English sources are weak. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:20, 22 November 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.