Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leon Earnhardt


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to List of Future GPX Cyber Formula Characters . – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 18:54, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

Leon Earnhardt

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Entirely non-notable secondary character. Fails WP:NOTE and contains nothing more than a plot summary, trivia, and original research. Potential copyvio as well. —Farix (t &#124; c) 11:37, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions.  -- —Farix (t &#124; c) 11:37, 9 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Note I've when ahead and remove the blatantly copyvio material from the article. —Farix (t &#124; c) 11:58, 9 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Merge, along with Hayato Kazami, Naoki Shinjyo, Karl Richter von Randoll, and Bleed Kaga to List of Future GPX Cyber Formula Characters. 159.182.1.4 (talk) 15:00, 9 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Merge to List of Future GPX Cyber Formula Characters as in agreement with 159.182.1.4 GVnayR (talk) 16:28, 9 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Comment The article Future GPX Cyber Formula is currently a huge mess the pages that do have characters are non notable stand alones and there are even articles about non notable fictional racecars with no references at all to speak of. If a merge is to take place I feel a major fixup is needed for the article as well. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 17:42, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:40, 9 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Merge to List of Future GPX Cyber Formula Characters, I have since cleaned up the article a bit and added merge tags on the other character articles for the series that cite no references or sources and appear to be all be in universe. So if this is to be merged I would recommend the others be as well. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 01:17, 10 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Merge Doesn't meet minimum standards for inclusion. -- Kraftlos  (Talk | Contrib) 11:29, 12 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Merge per above. 112.203.184.112 (talk) 06:22, 13 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Merge because it fails any inclusions guidelines and i wish the very best luck to the editor tackling them into a list. --KrebMarkt 07:58, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.