Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leonard J. Waks


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Keep Lightburst (talk) 01:47, 19 October 2023 (UTC)‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__.

Leonard J. Waks

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Does not pass WP:ACADEMIC; the only possible criteria is his distinguished professorship, although Hangzhou Normal University is not a major institution of research even in China. There is only one source in the entire article, and it is rife with WP:NOR. There have been a large amount of additions by WP:SPAs and possible WP:COI IPs/editors. GuardianH (talk) 19:48, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Philosophy,  and New York.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:51, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep - Distinguished professorship; Lifetime achievement award from John Dewey Society; H-index of 28; reviews of his books, , , . Meets WP:NPROF and WP:GNG. Netherzone (talk) 20:17, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep. Clear pass of WP:Prof as above. Nominator needs to study WP:Before. Xxanthippe (talk) 21:12, 12 October 2023 (UTC).
 * Keep. I'm not sure about the distinguished professorship, but citation numbers look like they might be a pass of WP:NPROF C1 in a low citation field; I also take the John Dewey Society activity somewhat seriously.  A cursorary search found several reviews  of his books, which could yield a solid WP:NAUTHOR.  I trimmed the indiscriminate list of journal articles, and more trimming is likely needed, but as usual, WP:DINC. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 22:12, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep. The GS citations look healthy for a low-citation area (264,153,136,103,74), all single authored, with a fairly slow drop off thereafter. Reviews of the subject's several books with major publishers have also been presented. Meets WP:PROF and AUTHOR. Espresso Addict (talk) 02:59, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep per editors above who know what they are talking about. Johnbod (talk) 21:04, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
 * WP:MAJORITY is not an argument, I'm afraid. Suitskvarts (talk) 14:00, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Phooey! But since, for once, the editors who don't know what they are talking about haven't turned out, further discussion is unnecessary. Johnbod (talk) 15:06, 18 October 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.