Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leonard Mbotela


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 01:54, 18 June 2024 (UTC)

Leonard Mbotela

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Doesn't meet WP:NJOURNALIST / WP:ANYBIO. BoraVoro (talk) 07:06, 21 May 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 07:04, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Journalism and Kenya. &#8213;  "Ghost of Dan Gurney" (talk)  08:09, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. &#8213;  "Ghost of Dan Gurney" (talk)  08:10, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep: Seems to pass notability, sources 6 and 11 are the best. I also found this and . The last one I posted seems to suggest political notability as well. Oaktree b (talk) 13:31, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Relisting comment: Relisting after reading Geschichte's comment. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 04:40, 4 June 2024 (UTC) Relisting comment: Final relist. I don't think a diff is required when an editor is quoting from a message right above theirs. Sorry if it was embarrassing but some comments in AFDs just don't make any sense. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 03:01, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep: Procedural keep per meeting at least some credible and keep...able input. There can be sources since the article somewhat meets inclusion by importance and source by few reliable source per WP:RS. Safari Scribe Edits! Talk! 09:44, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
 * I'm seeing lots of keep opinions from this editor on this day, and regrettably, most of them do not make sense. "Procedural keep per meeting at least some credible and keep...able input" is close to nonsense. "Somewhat meets inclusion by importance and source by few reliable source" is not a helpful or useful comment. Please state which sources are reliable and contribute towards notability. Geschichte (talk) 21:00, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
 * @User:Geschichte, it seems I used mobile that caused much of the typographical error. Also the time shows I was in a sleep carried mode (ready to sleep for the night), that I may have edited wrongly (but with love not with prejudice). I didn't see this as early as because I wasn't pinged. Please this type of comment should be partly, when necessary addressed to the editors talk page and if likely, only on that particular case. If I had made mistake, advise me on my TP and not leave a message without diff as you did. Now j understand your message on my TP. The diff I requested wasn't sent by you and it was difficult to check if there was any error with my vote in AFDs. Thanks though and will value the spirit of rechecking. Safari Scribe Edits! Talk! 20:26, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.