Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leonardi Framework


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 04:25, 3 June 2011 (UTC)

Leonardi Framework

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Poorly sourced article about a software package that contains no reliable sources indicating any notability. PROD was removed by single-purpose account after addition of "references" that are primarily dead links and do not address notability concerns. Kinu t/c 17:47, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 00:54, 21 May 2011 (UTC)


 * CommentHello ! The links have been rectified. Leonardi Framework is not a single purpose entity. In fact reference to its inclusion in a larger research academic community supported by the W3C have been added. Previous poorly working links (unfortunate redirects on the part of the source Internet sites which did not handle Wikipedia standard links) have been removed. Please consider the page Leonardi Framework for inclusion in Wikipedia. Respectfully, Kristeen2011 (talk) 10:00, 23 May 2011 (UTC)Kristeen2001
 * Comment The article still lacks citations to reliable sources. I see that some external links were added to some uses of this framework but it's still not clear how this subject might meet notability guidelines.--RadioFan (talk) 12:03, 23 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete The article has no inline citations at all, and three external links. Two of those links are to the Leonardi website. The third gives brief mention of the framework, in rather cryptic note form. Google searches have failed to produce any significant coverage in reliable sources. In short, no evidence at all of notability. JamesBWatson (talk) 09:07, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 27 May 2011 (UTC)

 Comment Here is the Google translation of the French Wikipedia page for Leonardi, here. Unscintillating (talk) 03:45, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Independent coverage does not need to be in English, but in this case no significant independent coverage has been presented in any language. FuFoFuEd (talk) 09:00, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Did the previous respondent look at the references on the French wiki page? I see nothing in the !vote to show this.  Unscintillating (talk) 00:44, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Errm, what references? There aren't any. Perhaps you mean the external links, including one to a download site, one to a page which links to a download of a "demo" and makes no other mention of Leonardi, etc. There is just one external link which could be regarded as a source, but even if it is a reliable source (which is not clear to me) it certainly does not constitute substantial coverage. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:52, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.