Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leonid Vladimirski


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Missvain (talk) 06:48, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

Leonid Vladimirski

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Notability is not inherited from the authors of the books the subject has illustrated. Google results show passing mentions. Mr. Guye (talk) 03:10, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:51, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:51, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:51, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, N ORTH A MERICA 1000 05:35, 12 February 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Delete Does not pass notablity guidelines for illustrators.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:31, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep, I found and added to the article a reliable source confirming that books illustrated by Vladimirsky were sold in 20M copies.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:16, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
 * I added two more sources, now the article contains three reliable sources, which are all among top Russian media, discussing the life and professional achievements of the subject in quite some detail. In my opinion, passes WP:HEY.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:20, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Sam Sing! 10:33, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete; not seeing the significant coverage here. Neutralitytalk 02:09, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Changing vote based on new material added to article; count me as neutral for this nom. Neutralitytalk 00:21, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.