Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leopard Coachlines Ltd


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. / ƒETCH COMMS  /  00:32, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

Leopard Coachlines Ltd

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Possibly fails under WP:BUSROUTE Kudpung (talk) 04:19, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions.  —Kudpung (talk) 04:21, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions.  —Kudpung (talk) 04:27, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - Major bus company in New Zealand with at least 100 buses. Don't know what the nom is talking by bringing up the essay (not policy or guideline) WP:BUSROUTES which doesn't apply here as this isn't a bus route. --Oakshade (talk) 04:49, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
 * You might  like to  review the edit  history  and see how much  more has been added since this article was nominated for possible deletion. That's one of the features of an AfD! - people will  try  to  save the article, and if they  do that's fine, and  comments about the nominator are not  required.--Kudpung (talk) 04:45, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,   Wifione    .......  Leave a message  06:20, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Fairly notable company. Adabow (talk · contribs) 06:07, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep They operate the Orbiter and that in itself makes the company notable.  Schwede 66  17:05, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not notable. A minor local company that is already adequately covered in Public transport in Christchurch. Jimmy Pitt   talk  17:22, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:10, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect/Merge Per Jimmy Pitt, article should be redirect to Public transport in Christchurch, where company is already adequately covered. Sailsbystars (talk) 17:31, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Not notable. Coverage in Public transport in Christchurch is sufficient. DerbyCountyinNZ (Talk Contribs) 09:22, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Keep While the article may be not far removed from a stub and doesn't have a lot of sources, the source cited is reliable and the company is notable: they are the first bus company in New Zealand to run their entire fleet on a biodiesel blend. Mtiffany71 (talk) 08:07, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Weak keep I did find some mentions that might count towards notability, but not a lot apart from the usual directories &c. I added another source that gives more details of the biodiesel campaign, for what its worth. bobrayner (talk) 22:39, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.