Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leopold Hohman


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. slakr \ talk / 07:53, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

Leopold Hohman

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:BIO. A private who commanded a six-man telegraph repair station, that's it. Fram (talk) 06:37, 29 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment: On a point of order, this is about one of 3 related articles separately nominated for AFD.  See Articles for deletion/Powder River Telegraph Station and Articles for deletion/Homan's Rock. Can this be closed procedurally and one unified multiple AFD discussion be held? -- do  ncr  am  17:12, 31 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete. Miserably fails BIO and WP:SOLDIER. Clarityfiend (talk) 06:44, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:20, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:20, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:20, 30 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete per nomination. EricSerge (talk) 13:41, 30 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep. Tag for addition of sources and better establishment of notability perhaps, but this appears to be a historic person with minor importance including that he is the inscriber of Homan's Rock, apparently a landmark like Initial Rock and other incribed rocks, also up for AFD.  Perhaps the other could be redirected to this one's Homan's Rock section.  There is a "merge all 3" vote at one of the 3 related articles. -- do  ncr  am  17:19, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Have you any policy-based reason to keep this one or either of the three. There are no reliable sources about the rock, nothing to establish evidence of notability on either of the three articles. He is not "a historic person with minor importance", he is until evidence of the opposite surfaces "a person of no notability at all". Fram (talk) 07:21, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 08:22, 7 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete, subject of article does not appear to have received significant coverage from multiple non-primary reliable sources, therefore this subject fails WP:GNG. If significant coverage can be found later, I would not oppose recreation of this article.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 13:20, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.