Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leostream


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 01:17, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

Leostream

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Looks like spam created for the sole purpose of advertising a commercial product. Poorly written. No reliable sources LirazSiri (talk) 07:40, 5 April 2009 (UTC) 
 * Delete. Agree with nomination. Absolutely no indication (reliable or not) of what makes this product notable. I42 (talk) 08:10, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:N and as an advert.  Them From  Space  20:02, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 00:36, 10 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete as spam for a non-notable company (see this Google News search--there is no independent in-depth coverage to be found in that list of hits). Drmies (talk) 17:19, 10 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.