Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Les 400 coups


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Daniel (talk) 19:58, 25 January 2023 (UTC)

Les 400 coups

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Non-notable publishing company. Mooonswimmer 14:42, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Comics and animation, Companies,  and Canada. Shellwood (talk) 15:12, 4 January 2023 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 16:24, 11 January 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Linguist111 (talk) 17:25, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Neutral at this point but it's worth pointing out that fr:Les 400 coups (maison d'édition) on the French project has multiple sources (not evaluated at this point) worth closer examination. MLauba (Talk) 15:30, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment Le devoir is a mainstream news publication in Quebec and almost certainly meets RS standards. Have not studied up on notability standards for publishing houses but hopefully it helps to know that at least a couple of the sources mentioned. Elinruby (talk) 19:34, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment While the article seems incomplete with only one source at the moment, it's important to note WP:ARTN. Belichickoverbrady (talk) 01:10, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * I looked at the French sources, Le Devoir is RS, the rest are less so. It's not the best for sourcing, but one of their authors won a prize from the Montreal Library Association for a book . The book has coverage in a few other sources, but it's all brief mentions of the publisher. Weak keep, stronger sourcing would help. Oaktree b (talk) 18:49, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
 * they're mentioned as having won awards at the Bologna Children's Book Fair, but I can't find much more than a mention about it. Oaktree b (talk) 18:51, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Here's the announcement of winning the "Bologna Prize for the Best Children's Publishers of the Year" for "North America". A prize is also awarded for the other major regions, e.g. Europe, Africa, Asia, Oceania, and Central/South America. It appears to be a prestigious prize in the children's publishing industry. Pushes it towards a Weak Keep for me too.  HighKing++ 15:18, 20 January 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.