Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lesbian Adventures: Wet Panties


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. The Bushranger One ping only 00:10, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

Lesbian Adventures: Wet Panties

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:NFILMS. The AEBN Award does not appear a notable award. No significant coverage on reliable sources. Cavarrone (talk) 08:13, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
 * It "does not appear" to be a notable award? And the consensus for this is where?  Erpert  Who is this guy? 14:55, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Here's what WIKIPEDIA has to say about AEBN: "AEBN, short for Adult Entertainment Broadcast Network, is an Internet pornography company that specializes in delivering material through streaming video in a video on demand format. Subsidiaries include PornoTube." So a private company in the business of selling video streams proclaims this the "lesbian video of the year" (a marketing boon for them, no doubt) and somehow that qualifies this as an encyclopedia-worthy subject?!?! Ummm, not in my opinion. If this is such a big award, where are all the reports in "reliable sources" reporting the great triumph? Where was that black tie awards ceremony held again? Did Billy Crystal moderate??? Carrite (talk) 18:17, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
 * What is your problem? Your !vote (as well as your comment below) seems less based on notability concerns and more on simply not liking porn.  Erpert  Who is this guy? 23:31, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Porn is swell. It also doesn't deserve a free pass into the encyclopedia. If anything, it should have a VERY HIGH bar for inclusion. Porn films should have to meet the criteria of all other films, for starters... So where are those substantial secondary sources to demonstrate notability, I ask? Carrite (talk) 04:51, 20 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete Reads like an advertisement and per nom. --Omegle7 (talk) 08:28, 19 December 2011 (UTC) — Omegle7 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. Cavarrone (talk) 09:22, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Cavarrone (talk) 09:26, 19 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete - Fails GNG. Pure porn cruft. It also pisses me off to no end that illustrative book jackets get bounced by the WP copyright volunteers with regularity, but every single publicity photo or packaging shot of a porn star or video seems to make the cut. How does this happen? Just wondering. In any event, ZERO sourcing for this utterly unnotable fuckflick. Carrite (talk) 18:13, 19 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete No coverage that I see in reliable sources. Nwlaw63 (talk) 21:55, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. "Awards" given by vendors to promote products they hawk do not make a substantial contribution to, and certainly do not demonstrate, notability. "Reviews" posted by vendors to promote their products do even less. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 02:16, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Redirect title to either the film series article Lesbian Adventures or its multiple award-winning director Nica Noelle.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 03:09, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.