Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lesley (color)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Aksi_great (talk) 20:23, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

Lesley (color)


(a) I cannot find any source to very this claim about a future event; it might be a hoax by a fan, but that isn't the key point because (b) even if I could, Wikipedia does not need to list every brand name chosen as a shade for every product made (consider the tens of thousands of names of shades of paint). Notinasnaid 09:25, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball and until such a time that this paint is released, it's not verifiable, violating WP:V. Even if it was, there's the question of notability to be addressed. --Brad Beattie (talk) 11:25, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
 * If they're mentioning Bausch & Lomb that'll be a colour for spectacle lenses and contact lenses, not a paint. Whatever, delete per nom. Tonywalton | Talk 12:10, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Very unlikely to be true: naming a product after a celebrity would mean paying royalty fees, and the obscurity of the celebrity in question would make that a highly unwise decision. Even if it is true, though, it's not worth an article. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  14:21, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete no sources, and the article does even specify what point of the color horseshoe this new color is on.-- danntm T C 18:09, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment It says This particular shade of Jade (color) resembles the actresses eye color. Tonywalton | Talk 20:01, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Query: would it be appropriate for me to mention this on WikiProject Color, since the article purports to be about a color? Notinasnaid 18:40, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Probably, although it shouldn't be considered necessary to notify the overseeing Wikiproject when nominating something. -Amarkov blahedits 19:13, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Bad crystal ball. -Amarkov blahedits 19:13, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong delete per no crystal balls, nom as " WP = not an indiscriminate collection of information", unverifability, and probable non-notability. Nihiltres 20:56, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Actresses's eye color? Very doubtful about that. There's no cites or references or anything!  K  yo cat   (T)•(C) 22:30, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, hoax. One google hit (this article) for "Baush & Lomb" "Caroline Lesley".  Were this genuine, I would expect to find press releases at least a year before production, which would already be well-advanced if the product were being sold 1Q 2007. &mdash;Cryptic 22:59, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete seems hoaxish. Rever e ndG 04:42, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
 * delete please it might be a hoax and is not verifiable at all Yuckfoo 02:39, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, smells like a hoax. Katr67 03:03, 21 November 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.