Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lesley Harris


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 02:33, 1 October 2023 (UTC)

Lesley Harris

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:NBAD and WP:GNG as the only claim to notability is the participation at the World Championships which is not enough. Moreover, can't seem to find any credible source to establish notability. zoglophie 20:10, 20 September 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BeanieFan11 (talk) 21:42, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Women, Badminton,  and Canada. zoglophie 20:10, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment If this is deleted, Lesley Harris (netball) should be moved to this page. A redirect from Lesley Harris (badminton) could also go to the page most useful to those looking for her, 1977 IBF World Championships – Women's singles. I thought when I created it being in a world chamionships was enough, but I haven't found anything to be able to dispute the comments above. Boleyn (talk) 08:17, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete. To be fair, simply being present as a competitor in a world championship was considered an automatic inclusion freebie in and of itself at the time this page was created — but sports notability standards have changed since then, so now she would have to be shown to pass WP:GNG. But the only footnote here glancingly acknowledges her existence while failing to be about her in any non-trivial way, which isn't enough. Bearcat (talk) 15:53, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete As noted, the sports notability guidelines have been modified and this article does not appear to qualify under GNG anymore. It should be deleted. Go4thProsper (talk) 10:06, 30 September 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.