Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lesley Sussman


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 00:06, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

Lesley Sussman

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Weak delete. This unreferenced WP:PEACOCKy bio doesn't quite meet WP:AUTHOR. Has not been the subject of significant independent coverage this article is the most substantial of the 15-20 or so Gnews hits. Google Books hits are also trivial. Tagged since Sep 2007 without improvement. His best-selling backlist book on Amazon is #1,290,904. THF (talk) 00:12, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak delete in agreement with nominator. Gnews hits are all trivial, passing mentions, no in-depth discussion of the article's subject. Gbooks delivers a fairly large number of hits, but these are for books authored by subject; not a single one of them is in-depth discussion or extensive coverage of this person. Writing two dozen books is one thing, but having people (journalists and scholars) discuss them is another. Drmies (talk) 01:42, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:00, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete A variety of less-than-notable things, however great the variety, doesn't make for notability. DGG (talk) 05:12, 11 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.