Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leslie Bevis


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Sufficient sourcing, and highly unlikely that a consensus of "delete" can be reached. (non-admin closure) Slashme (talk) 13:38, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

Leslie Bevis

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Delete: as non-notable minor actress; fails GNG. Quis separabit? 21:18, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  /wiae   /tlk  22:11, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep Her IMDB credits appear extensive, including recurring roles on notable shows. ShelbyMarion (talk) 23:41, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep agree with previous comment, also notable as a top model, 44 screen credits and one of those was for 44 episodes of a soap opera, also appearances in Dallas, 6 episodes, and Star Trek Next Generation, 3 episodes. I think notability guidelines are passed.Atlantic306 (talk) 01:44, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Then why have neither of you provided sourcing to back this claim up? These articles aren't just about WP:NACTOR – they're about WP:BASIC, and a BLP article with zero sourcing, and no additional sourcing provided during AfD, should be deleted on sight. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 16:56, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 05:28, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete at best the best solid work was the Young and the Restless character for one year, nothing else better for WP:ENTERTAINER aside from that. SwisterTwister   talk  06:07, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
 * As I simply hate no consensuses AfDs, I am willing to Keep even if reluctant because the Young and the Restless role is the best thing from this article.....now let's go nominate some other articles for deletion for now.... SwisterTwister   talk  04:24, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

 Relistedto generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 14:08, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep but a weak one. She's clearly had lots of roles and is a professional actor; problem is, not much in-depth coverage of her. I'm somewhat on the fence but note that there is interest in her in Wikipedia (an unofficial measure) but almost 90 pageviews per day suggests (for me) inclusion.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 23:16, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment I've added a NYT filmography reference to the article which can support a filmography, also found these which am adding, Atlantic306 (talk) 18:24, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:08, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:08, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 02:54, 1 April 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.