Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leslie Glass (adult model)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 05:15, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

Leslie Glass (adult model)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

One source does not an article make and otherwise fails PORNBIO and GNG. The medical article is about the treatment not her, Spartaz Humbug! 18:58, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep - plus these sources to pass the GNG. Morbidthoughts (talk) 02:45, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
 * 1 - Tabloid and an interview so primary 2 mmmm maybe but looks primary, 3, not in depth, 4 not in depth. Doesn't quite do it for me by I accept milage may vary. Spartaz Humbug! 06:53, 26 August 2015 (UTC).
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:54, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:55, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:55, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete seems to have been a minor celebrity at a certain time, and later when suffering from cancer became the subject of tabloid journalism. Certainly fails PORNBIO, also fails GNG because of WP:ROUTINE and WP:SENSATION which say that tabloid journalism doesn't add up to notability. I just can't see anything else than run-of-the-mill here: poor girl gets some odd job, discovers she looks good, makes money dancing on the table, appears in men's magazines, drifts into porn, and dies of cancer while the salivating crowd is looking on, yawn... Kraxler (talk) 01:41, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:28, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Does not meet the notability requirements of pornographic performers.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:58, 29 August 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.