Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leslie Randall (actor)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Jenks24 (talk) 12:35, 13 July 2012 (UTC)

Leslie Randall (actor)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Contested prod. Actor. Only one minor role and a few non-specific ones are asserted in the article, and the only reference is an IMDB entry. Google News Archives returns stuff about several namesakes, but nothing of interest. Delete. change to Neutral in light of provided reference, but per WP:NOTINHERITED, it's not sufficient for a full withdrawal.  Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 02:46, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep Clearly notable. Article is obviously poor but articles such as his wife's obituary show that he was a major star on 1950s British television. Tassedethe (talk) 03:42, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep IMDB entry has 21 parts, some of them significant. PatGallacher (talk) 08:47, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 19:44, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 19:44, 6 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Weak Keep From the ex-wife's obituary and some Google reading, would have to say starring in Joan and Leslie would make him notable. Most other parts look to be minor.  He did do theatre in his later years and earlier years.  It wasn't West End, but did get newspaper write ups.  He and his ex-wife also got newspaper notices in Australia for their failed TV series. Bgwhite (talk) 22:58, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.