Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leslie Roscoe


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:01, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

Leslie Roscoe

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This person is fictional, with its source a Fringe theatrefest show. See its creators' page where Roscoe is labelled their "imaginary friend". (I also performed a variety of checks prior to finding that). undefinedHydronium~Hydroxide~(Talk) 11:47, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete the only provided source is connected with the subject. The article is entirely original research right now. Seems to pretty clearly fail the notability guidelines (whether he is real or not). FuriouslySerene (talk) 14:45, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:32, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:32, 18 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete as my searches only found a few passing mentions here and there, certainly nothing for a better article. Like Jbhunley, it actually finally occurred to me this may also be fabricated so it's certainly delete either way if there's no actual article here, hahahaha.  Notifying PRODer  and also  who asks to be notified of these subjects.  SwisterTwister   talk  20:32, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete From what I remember the subject failed GNG and ENT when I first looked at him and I see nothing either in the article or a brief follow-up search to make me think he is notable. Maybe someone with access to specialist sources can find something on him, if so ping me and I will reconsider. J bh  Talk  20:45, 18 December 2015 (UTC) Bah... should have read the nomination. Looks like this is a hoax.  J bh  Talk  20:48, 18 December 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.