Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lesser frog


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Randykitty (talk) 13:39, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

Lesser frog

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Nobody would ever search under "Lesser frog" for any of the frogs listed on this disambiguation page. —Anomalocaris (talk) 23:00, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organisms-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:10, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:10, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:10, 12 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep this and the other frog DAB pages. No reason was given why "nobody would ever search" for this term.  Egsan Bacon (talk) 17:15, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep "I would never search under 'lesser frog'" doesn't mean "Nobody would ever search under "Lesser frog"".NotYetAnotherEconomist (talk) 21:33, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

Think again, people. Lesser here is an adjective modifying words than frog. If this were a page listing, say, "Smith's lesser frog, Johnson's lesser frog, forest lesser frog, swamp lesser frog", this would be a logical disambiguation page. But that's not what this is. This is a page listing "Lesser balloon frog, Lesser banana frog, Lesser Chini frog, Lesser spiny frog, Lesser swamp frog, Lesser swimming frog". It is completely illogical to group them together on a disambiguation page. —Anomalocaris (talk) 09:33, 17 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete unlike the members of the dab page "ornate frog", none of the above species are known as "lesser frogs". A search of GoogleScholar showed no (zero) frog species known as "lesser frogs", as did a more general search on Google. There is a lesser frog-eyed gecko which is not of interested here. Anomalocaris's point is well taken, this is not a likely search term, and none of the outcomes are so known.  As a result of none of these being known as "lesser frogs", this would seem to fall under WP:Disambiguation. --Bejnar (talk) 16:18, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete I agree with Bejnar that that the term "lesser frog" is not an obvious shortening of any of the common names of these animals.  Blue Rasberry   (talk)  16:48, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Seems to be a WP:PTM violation, and http://stats.grok.se/en/latest90/Lesser%20frog indicates it's not a search term. --Joy &#91;shallot&#93; (talk) 19:47, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment See also Articles for deletion/Beautiful frog.  Blue Rasberry   (talk)  13:39, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.