Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lesson XX


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Clear consensus to delete. Mentions in a google search does not imply that it meets our notability standards. -- RoySmith (talk) 22:41, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

Lesson XX

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Notability tagged since March 2009. No discussion on ANN outside of a basic Encyclopaedia entry and it being mentioned in a question for "Hey Answerman" (but not mentioned in the response). It was reviewed on a now offline site that is available archived but I don't see anything suggesting it's RS - only 3 articles use it on Wikipedia according to an advanced search. No sings of a license in English or Europe. Entry in Anime Encyclopaedia 3rd edition is minimal and make no comments sufficient for reception. LBGT isn't a subject I have expertise in so perhaps that community will have some ideas. I haven't come up with anything through a general search. SephyTheThird (talk) 12:54, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. SephyTheThird (talk) 12:58, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. SephyTheThird (talk) 13:01, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF  ( bark  •  sniff ) 15:52, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF  ( bark  •  sniff ) 15:52, 13 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete There's an entry in MADB, and the Anime Encyclopedia is promising, but there isn't much to write beyond the dictionary definition. Possible redirects to Ei Onagi who is the manga author but no article there, or Tokuma Japan Communications which is the producer, but the Tokuma article is too general for the company to have a list of works. AngusWOOF ( bark  •  sniff ) 14:37, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep There are quite enough mentions of it, while searching in google. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 15:32, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Google hits are not a sign of notability, Especialy as the results here consist predominately of user edited databases, blogs and copyright violations. Google is useful for finding leads to suitable sources and evidence, but in this case the results returned are not helpful.SephyTheThird (talk) 15:47, 15 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete Not enough independent sources to establish notability. Also I want to say that while google is nice you have to keep WP:GHITS in mind as well. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 18:47, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - Lacks coverage in either Japanese or English. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 14:52, 23 December 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.