Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Let It Be (2004 film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy keep. Nominator has withdrawn and no arguments for deletion. We can let editors able to translate sources assist in improvments to the article.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 08:50, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Let It Be (2004 film)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unremarkable film. No sources, no indication of notability. Nothing to suggest it even exists.  Lugnuts  Dick Laurent is dead 19:14, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

Do the interlanguage links have a say in thisWikiOriginal-9 (talk)
 * No.  Lugnuts  Dick Laurent is dead 07:27, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Taiwan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:51, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:51, 24 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment: Being "Unremarkable" is not a reason for deletion, and "no sources" is not either. - The Bushranger One ping only 04:04, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
 * But you happened to skip the part where I said "no indication of notability". Read it again, so it's clear in your mind.  Lugnuts  Dick Laurent is dead 07:27, 25 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete fails WP:GNG. LM2000 (talk) 08:13, 25 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment: Not being a reader of Taiwanese, and so not able to search for sources, I will await input from those Wikipedians better able than I to look for and offer source. We do have a great difficult in that this film was apparently not screened in the west as either Bô-bí-lo̍k  or as Let it be. Sorry Lgnuts, until hearing form Chinese-reading Wikipedians, I am reluctant to ignore WP:CSB.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 08:18, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
 * No problem. I did have a look at the Chinese articles, I'm not even sure they are the correct interwikis. I really don't like seeing things like this being deleted either. Now, if I can teach myself Taiwanese/Chinese in the next few days...  Lugnuts  Dick Laurent is dead 08:44, 25 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Strong keep - Look at the zh.wp article linked to by interwiki zh:無米樂-- there are clearly many references for this . One issue may be they are using min-nan for the phonetization which is not common. So searching in Chinese (無米樂) brings about lots more results. I can help shore up some of that missing info, but it's clear this is notable enough, and has references. It's been featured on LinkTV, which is one of the largest documentary distributors in the US  and it has won a number of awards. -- Fuzheado | Talk 15:58, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Nice work, Fuzheado. Happy to withdraw it based on the work you've done on the article. Thanks!  Lugnuts  Dick Laurent is dead 19:02, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.