Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Let The Records Play (Musical)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 01:24, 9 July 2010 (UTC)

Let The Records Play (Musical)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Delete. There is no indication of notability in the article. Searches have also failed to produce any evidence of notability: for example, neither "Let The Records Play" Boynton nor "Let The Records Play" Livingston on Google finds anything other than this Wikipedia article. The author of the article has actually stated on the article's talk page that it is intended to promote the musical. The article was tagged for speedy deletion under CSD A9, but I declined it because that criterion is for some reason restricted to musical recordings. Otherwise it would have been speedily deleted before now. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:30, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

I didn't mean advertise, I meant inform. You can't find anything on google because Madison Boynton or I have never had professional expierience and our show has not yet to been staged, we are currently working on staging the musical. Why is it that Wicked and Rent get their pages? What's different? It's just a musical and the page is informing people about it who want further information. Gabriel Livingston —Preceding undated comment added 07:41, 3 July 2010 (UTC).


 * Delete &mdash; Lacks GHits and GNEWS to establish notability. Period.  ttonyb (talk) 19:12, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:49, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Obviously completely non-notable. --mboverload @ 21:16, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

Why would it be notable yet? It hasn't been staged yet, Ghost The Musical has a Wikipedia page and It doesn't have near as much information as this page does. Plus Ghost hasn't been staged yet! Can we just let this article stay? It is Valid information and will hopefully become notable. —Preceding unsigned comment added by DefyingGravityForGood (talk • contribs) 22:13, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
 * So you, the creator of the article, are saying this is a non-notable play? If it's not notable, by definition it doesn't belong on Wikipedia. Please read WP:NOTE. --mboverload @ 06:48, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

Why is my article up for deletion when there are othe non-notable aricles on here? I think it's notable because 14 Year Olds wrote a full length musical. If That Was Mentioned in the Article, Would it be considered notable? —Preceding unsigned comment added by DefyingGravityForGood (talk • contribs) 07:33, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

How long are we going to debate this? Can we please just leave it up, If it flops I MYSELF WILL DELETE THIS ARTICLE! --DefyingGravityForGood (talk) 03:22, 5 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete. This musical has not even been produced anywhere yet! -- Ssilvers (talk) 05:22, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

It is being Produced!!! --DefyingGravityForGood (talk) 19:46, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

Y'ALL ARE BITCHES WITH NO LIVES!!!! Sit on Wikipedia all day and just find articles to delete. GO GET SOME FRIENDS!
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.