Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Let Them Come and Leave that Misery


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. Nakon 05:03, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

Let Them Come and Leave that Misery

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:GNG, no third party references to establish notability JMHamo (talk) 14:34, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Peru-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:05, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:05, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:05, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Comment: It looks like this is a potentially notable letter, but I don't know that this name is really what it's typically called. I can find mention of the letter in various footnotes and books as a good example of the era, and I found better sources when I searched for the author's name and the country Peru. If this is kept then it would probably be better if it was renamed since this isn't really the common name for the work. It's the catchiest I've seen, but so far only one source has explicitly called it by this name. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   08:54, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep -- The fact that the letter is published in a collection of key documents (as appears to ne the case) suggests we should be keeping it. I would hav no objection to an appropriate rename.  Peterkingiron (talk) 17:17, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 23:46, 23 March 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:07, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.