Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Let the Madness Begin


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Black Kite (talk) 00:55, 12 March 2019 (UTC)

Let the Madness Begin

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This appears to fail WP:NALBUM. It hasn't been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, independent, major reviews. It hasn't charted nationally. It hasn't been certified gold. It hasn't won a notable award. It doesn't meet the "medium that is notable" clause. It doesn't appear to have been on rotation on a major radio station. And a source search indicates that it hasn't been a featured subject of a substantial broadcast segment.  SITH   (talk)   18:41, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
 *  Redirect  to CirKus. Not enough found to justify a separate article, but a band's studio albums are always going to be worthwhile redirects to the band's article. --Michig (talk) 18:58, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
 * the article for CirKus is not about the same band – that might affect your vote above. As such, this could be a speedy delete per A9. Richard3120 (talk) 20:12, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Fair enough. Delete then, unless someone manages to create an article on the band before the AfD closes. --Michig (talk) 21:53, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 19:58, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 19:58, 4 March 2019 (UTC)


 * Comment: the band are now called Critical Cirkus, if anyone is searching for sources, but that doesn't seem to bring up anything further regarding notability. Richard3120 (talk) 20:22, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete: I agree. This fails WP:NALBUM as well as the GNG. It has no reliable sources. Also, why is the article stating that "CirKus" is the artist when there is no mention of the album on that page? I only see three albums ("Laylow", "Laylower", and "Medicine") listed on that article. I also don't understand why this could be a redirect when the artist's article fails notability too, relying on one source. Horizonlove (talk) 04:08, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
 * I've already explained above... the group Cirkus that has a Wikipedia article, and the group Cirkus that made this album, are two different groups. Richard3120 (talk) 13:37, 5 March 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom - not notable. Girth Summit  (blether)  12:40, 10 March 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.