Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lethal Weapon 5: The Return of Sing Ku


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. --Bongwarrior (talk) 08:21, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

Lethal Weapon 5: The Return of Sing Ku

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This was up for speedy, template was deleted by another user (who probably didn't realize he wasn't supposed to delete it without consideration). It's either: a) obvious hoax; or b) crystalballing, because there's no such movie. In fact, after searching Google, the only articles I'm coming up with about "Lethal Weapon 5" are random people speculating about it and the actors repeatedly saying "NO". Gromlakh (talk) 22:20, 25 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete. Per WP:NFF, "Films which have not been confirmed by reliable sources to have commenced shooting should not have their own articles." This movie--regardless of whether or not the article is a hoax--does not meet our notability guidelines.--Bigtimepeace | talk | contribs 22:32, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:HOAX and WP:NFF. Doc Strange (talk) 16:06, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.   -- --  pb30 < talk > 17:48, 26 January 2008 (UTC)


 *  Speedy delete per WP:HOAX -- there is no such project in development. There are zero headlines for this so-called project to be released this year. — Erik  (talk • contrib) - 17:54, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Struck out "Speedy" per JuJube. I'll remember that for the future. — Erik (talk • contrib) - 22:11, 28 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete as above, this is WP:HOAX fodder. (jarbarf) (talk) 03:02, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete, hoax.--The Dominator (talk) 16:23, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete hoaxalicious. Note that being a hoax in and of itself is not a valid reason for speedy deletion. JuJube (talk) 18:21, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per JuJube. Risker (talk) 21:27, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete this crap already. --Ouzo (talk) 14:51, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - I did a quick search on Google and found nothing about this film. TheProf07 (talk) 16:15, 29 January 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.