Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lethal weapon 5th installment


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:31, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

Lethal weapon 5th installment

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Main paragraph was just copied from Lethal Weapon (film series), which is where it belongs. Does not deserve a standalone article because it touches on WP:CRYSTAL and violates WP:NFF. Michitaro (talk) 15:51, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Technically a copyvio since it is clearly a copy-paste job from the main article, violating the license here, but I will leave to another admin to zap via G12  Dennis Brown  -  2&cent;   &copy;  17:15, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 19:31, 13 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete per TOO SOON. As each edit screen contains the phrase "By clicking the "Save Page" button, you agree to the Terms of Use, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the CC-BY-SA 3.0 License and the GFDL. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license", I would expect that this "released to Wikipedia" content would have simply needed a proper attribution to its source, rather than a WP:G12 deletion as copyvio. That otherwise addressable concern aside, this topic is premature and best belongs back where it came from.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 22:04, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete, agree with all the above. JJB 06:18, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:CRYSTAL. P. D. Cook  Talk to me! 15:39, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Not to quible, as a delete is in order, but please see my response to User:Life of Riley below. WP:CRYSTAL actually does allow that proposed projects might be discussed, and simply clarifies how, and instructs that such discussion must be properly sourced. It is WP:NFF that tells us a separate article on this topic is premature.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 04:07, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. No substance–the whole thing is based on rumors. •••Life of Riley (T–C) 23:50, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
 * We care only that reliable sources speak about the topic, and that such discussion makes the topic verifiable. Point here being that while the topic of a proposed Lethal Weapon 5 film IS sourcable, per WP:NFF, it is premature to have a separate article on this discussed 5th film. Remeber, that per policy "It is appropriate to report discussion and arguments about the prospects for success of future proposals and projects or whether some development will occur, if discussion is properly referenced." That it be discussed and spoken of at Lethal Weapon (film series) is fine IF properly sourced.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 02:34, 15 May 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.