Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lethbridge Twinning Society


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. JForget 00:32, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

Lethbridge Twinning Society

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Organisation is purely local in scope amd thus does not meet notability per WP:ORG. It also does nor cite any sources Wefa (talk) 19:44, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Sheesh. Not notable. Hairhorn (talk) 20:40, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

An organization that has connections with groups in Russia and Japan is purely local? Say what? I think any group that's devoted to international friendship is a notable organization indeed!WQUlrich (talk) 01:36, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
 * you apparently are unaware how city partnership or friendship relations work. Practically every city engaged in such relations (and that is a really large number) has a number of local clubs or associations for that purpose. My own hometown has 5 or 6. But membership and activites of these groups are purely local in scope, with the exception of visiting the partner city in question, of course. I don't think that fits notability guidelines.Wefa (talk) 16:39, 9 August 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget  22:50, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget  22:58, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete. Town and city twinning is a rather common and unexceptional occurence, and not every local "let's be friends with our town's twin town!" club can possibly be notable. Besides, there aren't any references. Bearcat (talk) 06:34, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete trivial impact.   DGG ( talk ) 16:07, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.