Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Letherbridge Central (UK Parliament constituency)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was SNOW delete. Jclemens (talk) 18:43, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

Letherbridge Central (UK Parliament constituency)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Fictional parliament constituency from the soap Doctors. Can't see that this could meet any notability guideline. In any case, has no hits on google or google news/news archives, and with no references is unverifiable. Beloved Freak  14:21, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  --  Beloved  Freak  14:22, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  --  Beloved  Freak  14:23, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fictional constituencies are pointless articles which do not teach the casual reader anything helpful. The only significant information in this article is the election result and the name of the fictional MP, which is really part of the plot summary and can be included as such if it is truly significant. Sam Blacketer (talk) 14:25, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per Sam (hi;), per nom. Good grief; what's next fictional soap opera medicines? They drive fictional makes of cars? Get fictional diseases? Spam fictional encyclopaedias? Cheers, Jack Merridew 14:52, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete or merge into Letherbridge (assuming it is worth keeping). Note Letherbridge North (UK Parliament constituency) and Letherbridge South (UK Parliament constituency) should get the same treatment as this one. Keresaspa (talk) 15:44, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
 * I've speedied the other two as A7. The JPS talk to me  17:57, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete fictional non-notable area. --Oscarthecat (talk) 16:10, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, because this seems to be clearly non-notable. Barras  ||  talk  16:20, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Not at all notable. Notability is not asserted through third-party sources. The JPS talk to me  17:57, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Really deserving of a speedy delete in my opinion. Non notable fictional subject. Paste  Let’s have a chat. 21:26, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete and do it hard. JBsupreme (talk) 23:39, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.