Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Letlive


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep.  Jujutacular  talk 21:51, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

Letlive

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable band. Although signed to Epitaph Records, they have not yet released their first album through that label, and currently only have plans to re-release an album release earlier on Tragic Hero Records. No citations can be found indicating that they have received any significant coverage. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 12:05, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:11, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Delete per WP:CRYSTAL, WP:HAMMER, WP:MUSICBIO, WP:UPANDCOMING, and WP:GNG. It may be too early to have an article on this band.  While their new CD has a name, there is no reliable source clarifying the songs or tracks that made the cut with the new studio.  I'm not sure if they have made a national tour, or have made multiple recordings.  We can't have an article on every up-and-coming band.  If someone could find two or more good sources, then that would prove general notability.  Get back to me if you find anything. Bearian (talk) 20:07, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Oh, I found this site that has a track listing and tour dates in UK. Is that enough? Bearian (talk) 20:10, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:30, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep - two more sources (both on WP:ALBUM/REVSIT): Sputnik staff album review (Fake History 4.5/5) & Rock Sound magazine (UK) group feature story ("Letlive are the most exciting band in the world"). -Ojorojo (talk) 20:17, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep - Album's just been re-released on Epitaph with bonus tracks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.175.139.78 (talk) 23:05, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Keep - While they may be "un-notable" in some places, the band has had significant coverage in UK media, especially in Metal Hammer Magazine . Also, if you listen to Metal Hammer's Podcast on iTunes, you can hear a lot of discussion about the band. Them being on Epitaph shows how significant they are, and should stay. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.7.220.14 (talk) 19:03, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment WP:BAND requires that a band not only be signed to a major label, but that they have released 2 or more albums on a major label (not necessarily the same major label). The re-release of this band's first album on a second label doesn't really count as having released 2 or more albums, regardless of whether Epitaph Records is considered major or not.  WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 14:00, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment - WP:BAND lists 12 criteria, any one of which may establish notability. While the band may not meet #5 (two or more albums on a major label), they meet #1 (multiple reliable sources) and #4 (coverage of international tour) (all sources on WP:ALBUM/REVSIT): Rock Sound, Sputnikmusic, Alternative Press, Allmusic. -Ojorojo (talk) 16:35, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
 * None of those are reliable sources. Bearian (talk) 19:54, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment Actually, I'd have to disagree with Bearian on that. As Ojorojo has pointed out, all of the sources are listed on WP:WikiProject Album as reliable sources, at least as far as critical reception is concerned.  The criterion this particular Wikiproject uses is that of professionalism: the cited sites are all staffed by at least semi-professional journalists and all have an editorial staff.  In the music business these days, online journalism is likely to be more relevant than print journalism.  WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 20:38, 12 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Oh, O.K. Change to keep per WP:HEY. Bearian (talk) 20:48, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.