Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Letsgomoose


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Stifle (talk) 08:34, 11 May 2023 (UTC)

Letsgomoose

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

A premature article of a concept/plan/idea, without meaningful updates in almost 6 years! Just one media reference and 2 self-references. WP:NOTNEWS.  P 1 9 9  ✉ 02:19, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions.   P 1 9 9   ✉ 02:19, 7 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete: The website of the project's own list of media appearances (https://www.letsgomoose.ca/media/) drops off at 2020. Deep Gabriel (talk) 02:51, 7 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:15, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep: See https://www.letsgomoose.ca/ Peter Horn User talk 01:50, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Yes, it has a website. That really makes no difference re notability. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 22:41, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  03:28, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Chief William Commanda Bridge. While the text at the target can be tweaked, nothing needs to be added. gidonb (talk) 21:44, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
 * If nothing needs to be added, then why create a redirect for a term that is not even being used in the target article? --  P 1 9 9  ✉ 12:27, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
 * It's right there. Just not linked. I should not propose linking if I propose redirecting it right there, should I? If followed, it would create a circular link. Note to the person closing: I'm fine also with the other WP:ATDs proposed below. There is somehing to be said for all and these should take preference over delete. Even some delete-sayers here do not object to an ATD! gidonb (talk) 15:26, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Merge to the main Ottawa article and a small piece about transit. They can barely get the O-line trains built and running properly, this is only an idea at this point. From what I can find, I'm not even sure it's being actively looked at anymore. Oaktree b (talk) 12:12, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
 * "Only an idea at this point." Then what is there to merge? We don't need to mention ideas... --  P 1 9 9  ✉ 12:27, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Relisting comment: One more relist to hopefully narrow down what's to be done. There's different redirect/merge targets proposed but no agreement on what that target should be. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Aoidh (talk) 05:38, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
 * I agree with Oaktree b that this should be merged. I suggest National Capital Region (Canada) as the most appropriate target. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 19:13, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: Two primary sources and one rouitne transportation news story Fails GNG. Found other brief ROUTINE news stories but nothing that meets SIGCOV showing notability. No objection if if a consensus forms for a merge/redirect target.  // Timothy :: talk  13:46, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Relisting comment: New sources added at the end of the discussion = consensus to keep? Last relist. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Xymmax So let it be written   So let it be done  00:39, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete it was never a thing. It doesn't appear to have ever been a substantial-enough proposal to merge elsewhere. Walt Yoder (talk) 01:17, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: As per submission. Samuel R Jenkins (talk) 05:57, 30 April 2023 (UTC) Blocked sock. NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 03:50, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep I quickly found some decent references in the media. I'll add them to the article. Nfitz (talk) 03:43, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
 * I've added four references to the article from four different publications, and expanded it a bit. The Ottawa Citizen one is an absolutely excellent piece - and the Globe and Mail article (which admittingly covers the same ground as the Ottawa Citizen piece) is national coverage. The other two pieces are from 2016 and 2020. I think though, the article would be better titled Moose Consortium. These references were easy to find - doesn't anyone do a BEFORE anymore? Nfitz (talk) 04:42, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Weak keep per the improvements by Nfitz (compare the nominated version to the current one). I'm still not sure that this wouldn't be better suited to a section of another article about mass transit in the Ottawa region, though, since there is not a lot to be said about it. jp×g 04:46, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Is there an article about mass transit in the Ottawa area, User:JPxG; that wouldn't be the worst place for it. Perhaps one day it would be the start about an article about the history of commuter rail in the Ottawa area. Nfitz (talk) 08:52, 4 May 2023 (UTC)


 * Merge with the transportation section of the National Capital Region (Canada). History person 2 (talk) 11:24, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Weak keep per JPxG and the improvements by Nfitz. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested ∆transmissions∆ °co-ords° 18:31, 5 May 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.