Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Letters Burning (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. —Tom Morris (talk) 15:50, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

Letters Burning
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log )

Not notable. Sources are CD baby, other Wikipedia articles, same ol' stuff. Claims notability with a part on a tour, but I see no other notability. Fails WP:BAND. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 22:10, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Everything on the Letters Burning page is factual. There is absolutely nothing that is fabricated or incorrect. Being an independent band some sources are a little bit more difficult to cite. If you can site a specific item where there is a question of citation or validation please list it. MOST of the information was at one time listed on the band's myspace, facebook, cd baby or reverbnation pages. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tallmirror (talk • contribs) 22:21, 14 February 2012 (UTC) — Tallmirror  (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Accuracy is not the problem. Notability is. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 22:23, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 14:59, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

What isn't notable? The "Letters Burning" page? I would hope that being on the Vans Warped Tour several times, playing a FREE music awareness tour throughout over 50 California High Schools, Doing a 4 state Hot Topic Tour and an Armed Forces Military Tour for US troops in Okinawa and Guam would be notable enough to warrant a wikipedia page for new fans trying to get more info. If there is a specific item, quote, or even content not following the correct wiki guidelines please list it and hopefully someone will revise it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tallmirror (talk • contribs) 19:02, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
 * They need to be covered significantly in reliable third party sources. Reputable websites like Allmusic. Magazines like Billboard, Entertainment Weekly, Rolling Stone. Newspapers. Etc. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 20:07, 15 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete - No evidence that this band meets Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Would reconsider if such evidence is provided, e.g., coverage in websites or publications along the lines TPH suggested. Rlendog (talk) 18:20, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:49, 21 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete Touring lacks coverage. No indication albums are on important label. Airplay is not national rotation. Current state of sourcing is terrible, including shops, own pages and wikipedia. Lacks significant coverage in independent reliable sources and I didn't find anything better. (is tallmirror a play on Tal Mir, indicating a conflict of interest?) duffbeerforme (talk) 07:38, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. No significant coverage found in independent reliable sources; does not appear to meet WP:GNG or WP:BAND at this time.  Gongshow  Talk 21:43, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.