Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leuricy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 04:45, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

Leuricy

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Wikipedia is not for things made up one day. Only ten results on Google. CyberGhostface (talk) 17:54, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Just a word from an essay, in one class, at a college, no need at all for this page.  C t j f 8 3 Talk 18:22, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep This word is the product of a High School class' attempt to create an objective ground from which people can more fully and comprehensively understand the gray area of moral conduct and the world around them. To delete the article is to take a direct stance against this understanding. Leuricy (talk) 16:20, 30 September 2008 (UTC) — Leuricy (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * We're not stopping them from '[creating] an objective ground from which people can more fully and comprehensively understand the gray area of moral conduct and the world around them', we're just saying it's not notable enough for inclusion on an encyclopedia.--CyberGhostface (talk) 16:53, 30 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete: Non-notable neologism, also is original research from a college class.  ascidian  | talk-to-me  18:26, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete No sign of notability, should have been speedied. Edward321 (talk) 23:17, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment I attempted to prod it but the prod was removed.--CyberGhostface (talk) 00:36, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete: Non-notable neologism.  Otolemur crassicaudatus  (talk) 09:11, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment Some !votes and text were removed from this discussion by User:Leuricy. Hobit (talk) 18:37, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks for letting us know. Their attempts are in vain, though; even if no one saw the comments they removed, this article's definitely going to get deleted either way.--CyberGhostface (talk) 19:18, 30 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Comment Items were deleted for a reason. Not "vain attempts". No reason to be hostile. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.71.233.10 (talk) 01:50, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment My apologies for not assuming good faith. By all means, please explain the good reason I'm sure you had for deleting someone's valid comment on this discussion.--CyberGhostface (talk) 02:23, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

KEEP THIS Article it has quotes to support it and will be useful in the english language.--Skier1924 (talk) 01:56, 1 October 2008 (UTC) — Skier1924 (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Comment Do you have any reliable sources that mention the word? Any publications?--CyberGhostface (talk) 02:23, 1 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Speedy There is no indication of notability at all here. Interesting, but not notable. Hobit (talk) 00:30, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

COMMENT- all things have been made up in a day at one point or time — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.211.4.115 (talk)
 * Delete - Wikipedia is not for things made up in school one day, and this is literally just that. -- Whpq (talk) 16:46, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Reply - and those made up things don't belong on Wikipedia - 00:11, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Comment- so then your saying that newtons law shouldn't be on wikipedia or other words in the english language?--Skier1924 (talk) 13:56, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Reply - on the day he formaulated them, no it would not be notable. After it was covered in reliable sources, sure.  If anybody could actually demonstrat that this is covered in reliable sources, then I would support a keep.  But there are none. -- Whpq (talk) 14:22, 2 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.