Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LeverX


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Seraphimblade Talk to me 07:29, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

LeverX

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:NCORP. Sourced to lists of system integrators, SAP vendors, and trivial coverage of the company moving to Miami. ~ A412  talk! 19:41, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Software, California,  and Florida. ~  A412  talk! 19:41, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep – Good coverage from editorial staff from editions of the American City Business Journals. Needs cleanup, for sure. TLA  (talk) 04:58, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
 * "Good coverage" is not a criteria for establishing notability and the reference from American City Business Journals is a profile provided by the company. Hard to miss as it even says it is "in their own words". Fails ORGIND.  HighKing++ 21:17, 22 January 2024 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 20:28, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete Google and ProQuest search results are routine coverage (moving headquarters, press releases, etc.). American City Business Journals is local coverage so fails WP:AUD and all I found what routine anyway.  S0091 (talk) 17:32, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Comment. While I appreciated the information about this company when I stumbled upon them months ago in course of my professional work, searching for sources and references I cannot get past the thought that it is just another software company. --Ouro (blah blah) 04:21, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete This is a company therefore GNG/WP:NCORP requires at least two deep or significant sources with each source containing "Independent Content" showing in-depth information *on the company*. "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject. I'm unable to identify any references that meet the criteria for establishing notability.  HighKing++ 21:17, 22 January 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.