Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leverate


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Dennis Brown - 2&cent; 21:48, 12 July 2015 (UTC)

Leverate

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable company, fails WP:GNG and WP:CORP. Joseph2302 (talk) 12:30, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep I typically presume delete for any org with under 100 employees, but in this case it does pass WP:CORP CorporateM (Talk)
 * 2 sources don't let it pass WP:CORP, plus we shouldn't be letting sockfarm spam like this stay on Wikipedia. Joseph2302 (talk) 21:27, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:33, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:33, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95  &#40; Talk &#41;  14:36, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
 * The financemagnates.com link is repeating a press release, not significant independent coverage. The globes.co.il ref is a routine announcement of fundraising and says almost nothing about the company. I can't assess the quality of the Hebrew-language sources used in the article.Dialectric (talk) 13:17, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete - I'm not a Hebrew speaker but I think I can see there's no good coverage (at least from an English POV) and my searches found nothing good aside from a few mentions and Thefreelibrary results (for a Levetate pre-2008). SwisterTwister   talk  05:24, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95  &#40; Talk &#41;  12:03, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep - What I am concerned with is if the sources are considered WP:RS. There is plenty of coverage and you can use Google Translate to get the idea of what the foreign references talk about. Globes has its own Wikipedia article, but is it considered reliable? I chose "weak" keep as the company is notable enough to be talked about in trade publications and in at least 2 different languages. Tell me I'm wrong as I could easily change my opinion. --TTTommy111 (talk) 22:56, 8 July 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.