Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leviathan (journal)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 04:17, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

Leviathan (journal)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable journal/magazine. Only 2 issues produced so far, neither of which seems to have generated much interest. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Crusio (talk) 20:34, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions.  -- Crusio (talk) 20:37, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions.  -- Crusio (talk) 20:38, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:41, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions.  -- Crusio (talk) 07:02, 28 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. Except under extraordinary circumstances, new journals will almost never be notable.  This seems to be part of a recent trend on Wikipedia of having articles on new journals.  It may be time to firm this up one of our deletion guidelines.   Sławomir Biały  (talk) 12:46, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.