Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lewis De Quirós


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result wasdel notability issue (tagged long before the afd) uncontested. `'mikka 01:24, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

Lewis De Quirós

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

No case made for notability Peter Rehse 08:21, 9 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Comment Generally the situation with aikido teachers ranks above 7th Dan in the Aikikai are considered notable in itself. Those listed with 6th Dan have something else adding to their notability and that would have to be exceptional for 5th Dans.  There are an awful lot of 5th Dans around.Peter Rehse 08:26, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
 * The problem here is that, in spite of this, he may not have been mentioned in many third party sources that can be easily verified, and that means he is still not notable according to policy.--Kylohk 22:06, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.