Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lewis Feilder


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete as an unsourced biography without any claim as to the notability of its subject. (aeropagitica) 21:58, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

Lewis Feilder
The son of a minor nobleman who has done nothing on his own does not pass WP:BIO. User:Zoe|(talk) 23:31, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Would have qualified for db-bio.--Anthony.bradbury 23:41, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

He is actually quite well known in aristocratic circles, his family are friends with the royals. I've seen him pictured with Prince William before, as they are friends. --Charles.bradbury 18:48, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

I've heard of him before. In fact, there was quite a lot of discussion among certain groups here in London last year, because of his actions. I'll try to find the news article online. It was in the Times last year. Jamie p077 18:34, 15 December 2006 (UTC)


 * "I've heard of him before" does not equate to WP:NOTABILITY. User:Zoe|(talk) 00:28, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

But as Jamie p077 wrote, there were certainly many mentions of him in the past few years in the papers. In fact, the reason I even ended up here was because I had tried to look him up before, but there wasn't an article, so I am glad that there is now, even if it does only contain basic information. --Charles.bradbury 04:37, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.