Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lewis Holden (political activist)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 12:53, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

Lewis Holden (political activist)

 * — (View AfD)

I don't think Lewis is quite notable enough for an article on Wikipedia, he may be known among the blogger community in New Zealand, largely as a result of his blog and the Republican Movement. Yet there's nothing in this article that indicates that he's actually notable by wikipedia biographical standards Brian | (Talk) 02:21, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
 * I agree that this article should deleted. Same views as above. - Shudda   talk  02:46, 10 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletions.   -- Brian | (Talk) 02:28, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
 * delete, but only because it lacks WP:CITE and hence, for me, WP:V. (I don't go out of the way to look for sources). Otherwise, his achievements seem important. --CyclePat 05:50, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment I suspect that this is a tough subject for which to establish notability.  It seems that quotations from blogs are not considered credible evidence at WP.  However, if someone is "attracting notice" from a significant number of bloggers, then the subject meets the criteria for inclusion:  "Notable here means "worthy of being noted" or "attracting notice", not "important" or "famous". It is not synonymous with fame or importance. It is not measured by Wikipedia editors' own subjective judgements. It is not "newsworthiness". This is the second paragraph of Notability.
 * --Kevin Murray 14:55, 10 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete unless properly sourced and referenced by end of this AfD. Wikipedia is not a listing of famous people or concepts but a reference Alf photoman 17:44, 10 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Weak Delete - as Alf photoman states. -- Greaser 03:26, 12 January 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.