Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lewis Reford


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was no consensu. - Mailer Diablo 04:30, 20 December 2005 (UTC)

Lewis Reford
Not notable. Merely being a candidate does not satisfy WP:BIO. Being a well-travelled investment banker is not encyclopedic. Delete. Skeezix1000 13:11, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep see Canadian federal election, 2006 (candidates) and Centralized discussion/Legislative candidates. - SimonP 15:07, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete nn candidate who, I can predict with total confidence, has NO hope of election. Eusebeus 17:30, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, see Centralized discussion/Legislative candidates. feydey 22:01, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - several times fewer Google hits than my name. Blackcats 20:39, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep wikipedia users such as myself would like to be able to look up major party candidates for national office. Kappa 05:56, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep The is the candidate for one of Canada's 2 biggest parties, in the downtown Toronto riding. Come on, you can't get more obvious than this! Nfitz 21:28, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete --- Candidates do not merit articles unless notable for other reasons. If he is a candidate for one of Canada's two biggest parties, then that's a reason why the party, not him, deserve an article.  Besides, this is my riding, and this guy will be in a tight three way race for a very distant second place.  209.202.119.248 14:53, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge with a list of Conservative Party candidates for the 2006 election. --GrantNeufeld 00:34, 20 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.