Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LexAble


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:21, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

LexAble

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

I am unable to find secondary sources that confer notability for this company. Angryapathy (talk) 18:47, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. The notability of LexAble's work has been recognised by the British Dyslexia Association, in the form of their Young Acheiver's Award, 2010. The British Dyslexia Association is the principal dyslexia charity in the UK, influencing government policy on dyslexia, both nationally and internationally.  I've added this as a reference in the LexAble article.  Note: I am a director of this company. Neil.cottrell (talk) 16:51, 2 September 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:51, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:52, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Neil Cottrell is the recipient of the "Young Achievers' Award" from the British Dyslexia Association.  That is the sole external reference for this article.  Google News finds nothing further.  This Business has developed Global AutoCorrect, which allows user's ideas to flow by automatically correcting their spelling as they type in any program.  Sounds like a memory resident spell checker.  I am not convinced that this business or its product has historical, technical, or cultural significance. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 03:00, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete per Smerdis and WP:CORP. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  12:25, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.