Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lex (rapper)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  d elete. - Mailer Diablo 08:52, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

Lex (rapper)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

New, up-and-coming hip-hop artist. No albums released, though there's assertion from the fact that there are participation credits for some numbers as well as working on a new hip-hop group. Still, issues with WP:N and WP:CRYSTAL. Possible WP:COI, but I find this doubtful. Dennisthe2 00:13, 19 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete. Clearly not notable per WP:MUSIC.  If the article has to tell you to "be on the look out" for someone, that's probably a clue right there.  Mwelch 00:21, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Not notable. The "be on the look out" comment should be rephrased if it is kept. Captain panda   In   vino   veritas  01:47, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - per Crystal spam, and non-notability of the subject.  ◄    Zahakiel    ►   01:59, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nominator. /Blaxthos 06:10, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete promotion. Non-notable.  Come back when you've sold some records.  Wavy G 06:48, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. Non-notable, and written a bit like a press release. -- Chairman S. Talk  Contribs  09:31, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, blatant spam about an as of yet non-notable subject. RFerreira 02:57, 20 March 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.