Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lex fori


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was keep. H e rmione1980 21:21, 16 October 2005 (UTC)

Lex fori
Transwikify Massysett 03:55, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Strong keep, expand - no mere dicdef, this is actually an ancient and well-developed legal theory, which counters the theory that the law of the place of the wrong should govern, irrespective of the forum where the lawsuit was brought. These ideas have battled back and forth in various fora for centuries, and entire law school courses are taught on the triumph of one or the other over time. BD2412  talk 05:10, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep and expand. This is obviously an important article. Carioca 05:16, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep and expand as important legal concept see Procedure (conflict). Capitalistroadster 05:19, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep Notable legal latin with much room for expansion. Xoloz 14:58, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Strong and speedy keep. Once again, a valid stub on an encyclopedic topic gets bitten for starting at the beginning.  Smerdis of Tlön 16:50, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep I am disappointed that this stub has been nominated for deletion. I have begun to expand it into a fuller entry and will complete the process as soon as I am able. David91 15:28, 12 October 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.