Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lexical knowledge


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Sandstein  18:10, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

Lexical knowledge

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Does not look like an encyclopedic topic. Someone's particular system, not mainstream and no evidence of notability. Alex contributing from L.A. (talk) 10:50, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete without prejudice. Notwithstanding that the tone is wrong because it reads like original research or summarization of an unidentified primary source, what we have here is a WP:POV attack on usurpation of conventional usages of the term, which get over 10,000 hits on GoogleScholar. ~ Ningauble (talk) 14:06, 29 August 2008 (UTC) moderate my tone ~ Ningauble (talk) 01:30, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete per nom as while this is outside my field of knowledge, the phrase Towards a definition does not have a place in an encyclopaedic article. WikiScrubber (talk) 20:46, 1 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.