Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LexiconGame

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete, apparently as a speedy at 22:18, 7 Jan 2005 by User:Dpbsmith who wrote ''Requested by sole author. Author did not understand Move function. Duplicates content of LexiconRPG. Prior to author's request, listed on VfD, 4 Deletes including author, 0 Keeps.''

LexiconGame
User Ben Wilson's attempt to fork the LexiconRPG article which is listed for VfD above. RickK 23:34, Jan 6, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete all forks used to get around VfDs. Jayjg |  (Talk)  01:53, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete the fork. Wyss 03:27, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Xezbeth  06:10, Jan 7, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete IAW outcome of LexiconRPG. I wasn't trying to circumvent, but to rename since LexiconRPG is not the proper name. --BenWilson 20:15, Jan 7, 2005 (UTC)
 * The way to do this is with a Move. Although this could be done while the VfD is in process, there are so many ways this could cause confusion that it's better to wait and see whether it survives. For now, BenWilson should place a note on Talk:LexiconRPG saying that if it survives VfD he intends to move it to LexiconGame and explain why. The sole editor (except for the VfD nominator) has requested deletion of LexiconGame. It is essentially duplicate content from LexiconRPG so deleting it loses nothing important. It would have to be deleted to permit LexiconRPG to be moved later. For these reasons, I have deleted it now. If anyone wants it restored, just let me know. Dpbsmith (talk) 02:19, 8 Jan 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.